ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Gigabyte M27F A
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSGigabyte M27F A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Gigabyte M27F A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F A leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Gigabyte M27F A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte M27F A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | Gigabyte M27F A | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or Gigabyte M27F A better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Gigabyte M27F A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F A leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Gigabyte M27F A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F A leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).