ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs MSI Optix G251PF
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI Optix G251PF
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and MSI Optix G251PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI Optix G251PF leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI Optix G251PF leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about resolution.
MSI Optix G251PF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | MSI Optix G251PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or MSI Optix G251PF better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and MSI Optix G251PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI Optix G251PF leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI Optix G251PF leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI Optix G251PF leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).