ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K vs Philips 49B2U6900CH
ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · Mini LED IPSPhilips 49B2U6900CH
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 75 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 49B2U6900CH
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K | Philips 49B2U6900CH | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| Mini LED IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,100 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K or Philips 49B2U6900CH better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-K leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).