BenQ BL3201PH vs Philips 49B2U6900CH
BenQ BL3201PH
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 49B2U6900CH
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 75 Hz · VABenQ BL3201PH and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: BenQ BL3201PH leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
BenQ BL3201PH
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 49B2U6900CH
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL3201PH | Philips 49B2U6900CH | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,100 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL3201PH or Philips 49B2U6900CH better?
BenQ BL3201PH and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: BenQ BL3201PH leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).