ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
If you care most about resolution.
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 280 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $550 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).