Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs MSI G273CQ

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 72.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · MSI

MSI G273CQ

27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 72.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate69
Resolution80
Panel66
Verdict

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and MSI G273CQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.

  • Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

MSI G273CQ

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGVMSI G273CQ
72Gear score72
32″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate170 Hz
IPSPanelVA
5 msResponse time—
≈ $550Estimated price≈ $160

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or MSI G273CQ better?

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and MSI G273CQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

How much do they cost?

Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV ≈ $550, MSI G273CQ ≈ $160. Current prices vary by store.