ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | TN |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278Q leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).