ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs BenQ XL2735
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDBenQ XL2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and BenQ XL2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2735 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ XL2735
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | BenQ XL2735 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | TN |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or BenQ XL2735 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and BenQ XL2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2735 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2735 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).