ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ leads (0.4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 0.4 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | ≈ $280 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ leads (0.4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K ≈ $2,700, ASUS TUF Gaming VG27BQ ≈ $280. Current prices vary by store.