ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs Cooler Master GM34-CW
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSCooler Master GM34-CW
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Cooler Master GM34-CW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM34-CW leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Cooler Master GM34-CW
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | Cooler Master GM34-CW | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or Cooler Master GM34-CW better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Cooler Master GM34-CW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM34-CW leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM34-CW leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).