ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs Gigabyte G32QC A
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSGigabyte G32QC A
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Gigabyte G32QC A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte G32QC A leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte G32QC A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | Gigabyte G32QC A | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | ≈ $392 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or Gigabyte G32QC A better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Gigabyte G32QC A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte G32QC A leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte G32QC A leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K ≈ $2,700, Gigabyte G32QC A ≈ $392. Current prices vary by store.