ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs MSI G255PF E2
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSMSI G255PF E2
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and MSI G255PF E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G255PF E2 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G255PF E2 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
MSI G255PF E2
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | MSI G255PF E2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | ≈ $125 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or MSI G255PF E2 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and MSI G255PF E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G255PF E2 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: MSI G255PF E2 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G255PF E2 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K ≈ $2,700, MSI G255PF E2 ≈ $125. Current prices vary by store.