ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs AXM 2778
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSAXM 2778
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and AXM 2778 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AXM 2778 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: AXM 2778 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
AXM 2778
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | AXM 2778 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or AXM 2778 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and AXM 2778 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AXM 2778 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: AXM 2778 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AXM 2778 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).