ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Cooler Master Tempest GP2711
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSCooler Master Tempest GP2711
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · QD-VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Cooler Master Tempest GP2711
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | QD-VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $333 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).