ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs KOORUI 24E3
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSKOORUI 24E3
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and KOORUI 24E3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: KOORUI 24E3 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: KOORUI 24E3 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
KOORUI 24E3
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | KOORUI 24E3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $110 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or KOORUI 24E3 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and KOORUI 24E3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: KOORUI 24E3 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: KOORUI 24E3 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KOORUI 24E3 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).