ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs MSI Optix G32CQ4
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSMSI Optix G32CQ4
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and MSI Optix G32CQ4 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI Optix G32CQ4 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
MSI Optix G32CQ4
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | MSI Optix G32CQ4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or MSI Optix G32CQ4 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and MSI Optix G32CQ4 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI Optix G32CQ4 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI Optix G32CQ4 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).