ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Philips 32M1C5500VL
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSPhilips 32M1C5500VL
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Philips 32M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 32M1C5500VL leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Philips 32M1C5500VL
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Philips 32M1C5500VL | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Philips 32M1C5500VL better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Philips 32M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 32M1C5500VL leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 32M1C5500VL leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).