ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Prism M27EQ
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSPrism M27EQ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Prism M27EQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Prism M27EQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Prism M27EQ leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Prism M27EQ
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Prism M27EQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Prism M27EQ better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Prism M27EQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Prism M27EQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Prism M27EQ leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Prism M27EQ leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).