ASUS ProArt PA34VC vs Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
ASUS ProArt PA34VC
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt PA34VC and Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt PA34VC leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt PA34VC
If you care most about resolution.
Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt PA34VC | Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt PA34VC or Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL better?
ASUS ProArt PA34VC and Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ProArt PA34VC leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).