ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q vs Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q | Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q or Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M1N3200VL leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).