Monitors / Comparison
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs Philips 27M1C5200W
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNVery good
Refresh rate86
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips 27M1C5200W
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAVery good
Refresh rate86
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Philips 27M1C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q | Philips 27M1C5200W | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $279 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q or Philips 27M1C5200W better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Philips 27M1C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Similar comparisons
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ROG Strix XG258QASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs BenQ EX2780QPhilips 27M1C5200W vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Philips 27M1C5200W vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVPhilips 27M1C5200W vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVPhilips 27M1C5200W vs BenQ EX2780Q