ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Philips 27M1C5200W
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M1C5200W
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Philips 27M1C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M1C5200W leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Philips 27M1C5200W
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Philips 27M1C5200W | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Philips 27M1C5200W better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Philips 27M1C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M1C5200W leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M1C5200W leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).