Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q

23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA

27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

  • Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG248QSamsung LC27RG50FQNXZA
70Gear score70
23.8″Screen size27″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
TNPanelVA
1 msResponse time4 ms
≈ $279Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q or Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA better?

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).

Similar comparisons

ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs ASUS ROG Strix XG258QASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs BenQ EX2780QSamsung LC27RG50FQNXZA vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVSamsung LC27RG50FQNXZA vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVSamsung LC27RG50FQNXZA vs BenQ EX2780Q