Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSSamsung LC27RG50FQNXZA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung LC27RG50FQNXZA leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).