ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q vs Eizo FS2735
ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSEizo FS2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG256Q and Eizo FS2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: Eizo FS2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Eizo FS2735
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q | Eizo FS2735 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $173 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q or Eizo FS2735 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q and Eizo FS2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: Eizo FS2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG256Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).