ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs Eizo FS2735
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSEizo FS2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Eizo FS2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Eizo FS2735 leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Eizo FS2735 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Eizo FS2735
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | Eizo FS2735 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or Eizo FS2735 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Eizo FS2735 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Eizo FS2735 leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Eizo FS2735 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Eizo FS2735 leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).