ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM
29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 220 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 34M2C3500L
34″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (220 Hz vs 180 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 29.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 220 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (220 Hz vs 180 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (220 Hz vs 180 Hz).