ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ vs Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 34M2C3500L
34″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ | Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ or Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 34M2C3500L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).