ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG vs Philips 25M2N5200U
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · Fast IPSPhilips 25M2N5200U
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 390 Hz · Fast IPSASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 25M2N5200U
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG | Philips 25M2N5200U | |
|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gear score | 81 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 390 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG or Philips 25M2N5200U better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).