MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M vs Philips 25M2N5200U
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSPhilips 25M2N5200U
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 390 Hz · Fast IPSMSI MPG 274URDFW E16M and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81.
- Resolution: MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 25M2N5200U
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M | Philips 25M2N5200U | |
|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gear score | 81 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 390 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M or Philips 25M2N5200U better?
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81. Resolution: MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 160 Hz).