Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS vs Philips 27M2C5501/01

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 27M2C5501/01

27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Philips 27M2C5501/01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCSPhilips 27M2C5501/01
75Gear score75
31.5″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
180 HzRefresh rate180 Hz
VAPanelVA
1 msResponse time1 ms
≈ $249Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS or Philips 27M2C5501/01 better?

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Philips 27M2C5501/01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.