BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q vs Philips 27M2C5501/01
BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2C5501/01
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VABenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q and Philips 27M2C5501/01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5501/01 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2C5501/01 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Philips 27M2C5501/01
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q | Philips 27M2C5501/01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $270 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q or Philips 27M2C5501/01 better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q and Philips 27M2C5501/01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5501/01 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2C5501/01 leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5501/01 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).