ASUS ROG Strix XG349C vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG349C | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| 34.1″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $650 | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG349C or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C ≈ $650, Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700. Current prices vary by store.