ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ vs ASUS TUF Gaming
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDASUS TUF Gaming
27″ · 2560×1440 · 260 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and ASUS TUF Gaming are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ASUS TUF Gaming
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | ASUS TUF Gaming | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 260 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $329 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ or ASUS TUF Gaming better?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and ASUS TUF Gaming are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 138 Hz).