ASUS TUF Gaming vs MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED
ASUS TUF Gaming
27″ · 2560×1440 · 260 Hz · IPSMSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · OLEDASUS TUF Gaming and MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming | MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 260 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| ≈ $329 | Estimated price | ≈ $850 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming or MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED better?
ASUS TUF Gaming and MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming leads (260 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS TUF Gaming ≈ $329, MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED ≈ $850. Current prices vary by store.