ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ vs Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDGigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (144 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (0.03 ms vs 0.1 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $890 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ or Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ better?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (144 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (0.03 ms vs 0.1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (144 Hz vs 138 Hz).