Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ vs MSI MAG 274QF X24
Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · OLEDGigabyte AORUS CO49DQ and MSI MAG 274QF X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 274QF X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 274QF X24
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ | MSI MAG 274QF X24 | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 49″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 5120×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | — |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $890 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ or MSI MAG 274QF X24 better?
Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ and MSI MAG 274QF X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 274QF X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 274QF X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).