ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q vs Samsung C27FG73
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q
24″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · TNSamsung C27FG73
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q and Samsung C27FG73 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q | Samsung C27FG73 | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q or Samsung C27FG73 better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q and Samsung C27FG73 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64. Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).