Monitors / Comparison
ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs Samsung C27FG73
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate62
Resolution55
Panel80
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung C27FG73
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VAGood
Refresh rate62
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict
ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q and Samsung C27FG73 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q | Samsung C27FG73 | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $246 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q or Samsung C27FG73 better?
ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q and Samsung C27FG73 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
Similar comparisons
ASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248QASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs ASUS TUF GAMING VG259QASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG279Q1RASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs MSI G242CASUS TUF GAMING VG249Q vs MSI G242L E14Samsung C27FG73 vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248QSamsung C27FG73 vs ASUS TUF GAMING VG259QSamsung C27FG73 vs MSI G242CSamsung C27FG73 vs MSI G242L E14