ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 360 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 360 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).