ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ vs electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSelectriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ and electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
If you care most about refresh rate.
electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ | electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ or electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ and electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: electriQ eiQ-34SUWD144FSHQ leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).