ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q
32″ · 2560×1440 · 175 Hz · IPS · 2020Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG329Q and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q leads (175 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 175 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| 2020 | Release year | — |
| ≈ $399 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q leads (175 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q leads (175 Hz vs 165 Hz).