ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ
43″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 43″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG43UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).