Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ

64.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A

32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.

  • Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
Pick this

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQCorsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A
73Gear score73
64.5″Screen size32″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
144 HzRefresh rate144 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time12 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ or Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A better?

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).