Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ

64.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32UHD144

32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.

  • Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
Pick this

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQCorsair XENEON 32UHD144
73Gear score73
64.5″Screen size32″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
144 HzRefresh rate144 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time12 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 better?

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).

Similar comparisons

ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs Razer Raptor 27ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-ACorsair XENEON 32UHD144 vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-ACorsair XENEON 32UHD144 vs Razer Raptor 27Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 vs ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftCorsair XENEON 32UHD144 vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ