ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM vs Gigabyte M32QC-SA
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · TNGigabyte M32QC-SA
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Gigabyte M32QC-SA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M32QC-SA leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 170 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte M32QC-SA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM | Gigabyte M32QC-SA | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $325 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM or Gigabyte M32QC-SA better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Gigabyte M32QC-SA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Gigabyte M32QC-SA leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 170 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 170 Hz).