ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM vs Rampage Cyclops CY49R165
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · TNRampage Cyclops CY49R165
49″ · 3840×1080 · 165 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Rampage Cyclops CY49R165
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM | Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM or Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Rampage Cyclops CY49R165 leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).