ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A vs Gigabyte M32UP
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · Fast IPSGigabyte M32UP
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Gigabyte M32UP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M32UP leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte M32UP
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A | Gigabyte M32UP | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 81 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 310 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $770 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A or Gigabyte M32UP better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Gigabyte M32UP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81. Resolution: Gigabyte M32UP leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).