ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A vs INNOCN 27M2V
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · Fast IPSINNOCN 27M2V
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · Mini LED IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and INNOCN 27M2V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81.
- Resolution: INNOCN 27M2V leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
If you care most about refresh rate.
INNOCN 27M2V
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A | INNOCN 27M2V | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 81 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 310 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | Mini LED IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $500 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A or INNOCN 27M2V better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and INNOCN 27M2V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81. Resolution: INNOCN 27M2V leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 160 Hz).