ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A
28″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| 28″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $449 | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A ≈ $449, Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700. Current prices vary by store.